Human Authorial Locus
A human author remains responsible for the creative work placed into the world and exercises substantive authorship within the process.
For Mielogos, Symbiotic Authorship is not determined by how much machine-generated wording survives in a final text. It concerns the creative causal relation through which a work or defined practice develops.
A human author remains responsible for the creative work placed into the world and exercises substantive authorship within the process.
The process is not simply one-way generation. System contributions affect human decisions, and those decisions materially shape what the system is subsequently asked, shown, constrained, revised, or invited to do.
The relation changes what the work or defined creative practice becomes in a way that is creatively consequential rather than incidental.
Textual provenance asks where particular words or passages came from. Creative causal provenance asks what interactions, refusals, reinterpretations, revisions, and feedback loops materially shaped the work’s development. The two may overlap, but they are not the same.
A machine suggestion can matter even when its wording is rejected. Refusal can redirect structure. A mistaken proposal can expose a problem. A line that disappears can still change the next decision.
Describing a practice as Symbiotic Authorship does not automatically make a work good, publishable, lawful, copyrightable, ethical, or eligible for any external programme. Different institutional questions require different rules.