MIELOGOS
Symbiotic Authorship

The creative relation matters.

For Mielogos, Symbiotic Authorship is not determined by how much machine-generated wording survives in a final text. It concerns the creative causal relation through which a work or defined practice develops.

The institutional category

Three jointly necessary elements.

01

Human Authorial Locus

A human author remains responsible for the creative work placed into the world and exercises substantive authorship within the process.

02

Bidirectionally Conditioned Creative Relation

The process is not simply one-way generation. System contributions affect human decisions, and those decisions materially shape what the system is subsequently asked, shown, constrained, revised, or invited to do.

03

Material Causal Effect

The relation changes what the work or defined creative practice becomes in a way that is creatively consequential rather than incidental.

Textual provenance ≠ creative causal provenance.

Creative causal provenance

Textual provenance asks where particular words or passages came from. Creative causal provenance asks what interactions, refusals, reinterpretations, revisions, and feedback loops materially shaped the work’s development. The two may overlap, but they are not the same.

A machine suggestion can matter even when its wording is rejected. Refusal can redirect structure. A mistaken proposal can expose a problem. A line that disappears can still change the next decision.

What it is not

  • not a percentage test for machine-generated wording;
  • not an AI-detector result;
  • not a claim that every use of a generative tool is symbiotic;
  • not a quality judgment;
  • not a copyright ruling;
  • not a philosophical test for machine consciousness or personhood.

Classification is not eligibility

Describing a practice as Symbiotic Authorship does not automatically make a work good, publishable, lawful, copyrightable, ethical, or eligible for any external programme. Different institutional questions require different rules.

Institutional scope. This is the category used by Mielogos. It is not presented as a universal metaphysical theory of authorship.